Litigation Details for Pharmacyclics LLC v. Sandoz Inc. (D. Del. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Sandoz Inc. (D. Del. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Subscribe | Date Filed | 2018-02-01 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2021-05-11 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Colm Felix Connolly |
| Jury Demand | Defendant | Referred To | Christopher J. Burke |
| Parties | CIPLA LIMITED | ||
| Patents | 10,004,746; 10,010,507; 10,016,435; 10,106,548; 10,125,140; 10,213,386; 10,294,231; 10,294,232; 7,514,444; 8,008,309; 8,476,284; 8,497,277; 8,697,711; 8,735,403; 8,754,090; 8,754,091; 8,952,015; 8,957,079; 8,999,999; 9,125,889; 9,181,257; 9,296,753; 9,540,382; 9,655,857; 9,713,617; 9,725,455; 9,795,604; 9,801,881; 9,801,883 | ||
| Attorneys | Madeline E. Byrd | ||
| Firms | Farnan LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Pharmacyclics LLC v. Sandoz Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Subscribe .
Biologic Drugs cited in Pharmacyclics LLC v. Sandoz Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Subscribe , ⤷ Subscribe , and ⤷ Subscribe .
Details for Pharmacyclics LLC v. Sandoz Inc. (D. Del. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000-00-00 | External link to document | |||
| 2018-02-01 | 1 | United States Patent Nos. 8,008,309 (“the ’309 Patent”); 7,514,444 (“the ’444 Patent”); 8,697,711 (“…(“the ’711 Patent”); 8,735,403 (“the ’403 Patent”); 8,957,079 (“the ’079 Patent”); 9,181,257 (“the ’257…’257 Patent”); 8,754,091 (“the ’091 Patent”); 8,497,277 (“the ’277 Patent”); 8,952,015 (“the ’015 Patent…37 PageID #: 2 Patent”); 9,296,753 (“the ’753 Patent”); 9,725,455 (“the ’455 Patent”); 9,540,382 (“the… 1. This action for patent infringement, brought pursuant to the patent laws of the United States | External link to document | |
| 2019-02-14 | 103 | ’548 Patents, and U.S. Patent Nos. 8,999,999 (“the ’999 Patent”); 9,801,881 (“the ’881 Patent”); 9,801,883… 16304 Patent”); 10,125,140 (“the ’140 Patent”); and 10,106,548 (“the ’548 Patent”). Sun has submitted… 1. This action for patent infringement, brought pursuant to the patent laws of the United States… the expiration of the U.S. Patent Nos. 9,296,753 (“the ’753 Patent”) 9,725,455 (“the ’455 Case 1:18…26. This civil action for patent infringement arises under the patent laws of the United States | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
